Cancelling or Modifying Family Law Agreements in British Columbia
A family law agreement may be invalid if the process by which it was created is flawed in one of the following ways:
- A spouse did not enter into the agreement of their own free will. If a spouse is threatened, manipulated or pressured into signing a family law agreement, then the agreement is not fair and the courts won’t enforce it.
- The family law agreement is significantly unequal and there is not a reasonable justification for this unfairness.
- A spouse did not understand the agreement. This may occur if a spouse does not have their own lawyer to give them family law advice before they sign a family law agreement. Independent legal advice will help ensure that both spouses understand the agreement, including how their rights and responsibilities in the agreement compare to the law in BC.
- One spouse signed the family law agreement without full disclosure of family property and debt, or after being mislead by the other spouse.
Cancelling a Family Law Agreement under the Family Law Act
Section 214 of the Family Law Act allows the court to cancel and replace parts of a family law agreement with a court order. The Family Law Act contains different tests for cancelling different parts of a family law agreement.
Test for Cancelling Terms of Guardianship, Parenting Responsibilities, Parenting Time and Contact
Terms regarding guardianship, parenting responsibilities, parenting time and contact must all be made in the best interest of the child, as required by sections 44 and 58 of the Family Law Act. If a court determines that certain terms in a family law agreement are no longer, or never were, in the best interests of the child, then those parts of the agreement will be replaced with a new order. Read more about best interest of the child.
Test for Cancelling Terms of Child Support
The court can replace child support terms in a family law agreement if they depart from the Federal Child Support Guidelines in way that is unreasonable, pursuant to section 148 of the Family Law Act. The court can also replace child support terms if the family law agreement provides for inadequate child support, or if after the agreement is signed:
- The time that the child spends with each parent changes significantly;
- The incomes of the parents increase or decrease; or
- A child becomes ineligible for child support.
Read more about the Child Support Guidelines.
Test for Cancelling Terms of Spousal Support
To determine whether spousal support terms in a family law agree should be replaced, the court will apply one of two legal tests under section 164 of the Family Law Act. Either test, or both together, can be used as the basis on which to cancel a spousal support agreement.
The first test (FLA section 164(3)) looks at the validity of the spousal support agreement. If a spouse 1) provides insufficient or misleading information about their income, assets, debts, or other information 2) if they took improper advantage of their spouse’s vulnerability, 3) if one spouse did not understand the agreement, or 4) if the agreement is contractually invalid, then the court may set aside the spousal support terms of a family law agreement.
The second test is whether the spousal support terms in the agreement are significantly unfair when measured against the factors set out at section 164(5) of the Family Law Act. If they are, then even if the first test is passed the court can set aside the spousal support terms.
Test for Cancelling Terms for Division of Property and Debt
The Family Law Act provides two tests when asked to enforce property and debt terms in a family law agreement. The first test at FLA section 93(3) mirrors the first stage of the spousal support test at section 164(3). If a spouse 1) provides insufficient or misleading information about their assets, debts, or other information 2) if they took improper advantage of their spouse’s vulnerability, 3) if one spouse did not understand the agreement, or 4) if the agreement is contractually invalid, then the court may set aside the property division terms of a family law agreement. The second test permits the court to set aside a family law property agreement if it is significantly unfair under section 93(5) of the Family Law Act.
An application to set aside an agreement about property or spousal support must be made within two years from the date the spouse first discovered, or reasonably ought to have discovered, the grounds for making the application.