Can We Use Collaborative Law If We Disagree on Some Issues?

FAQs

Can We Still Use Collaborative Family Law If We Disagree on Certain Issues?

Yes, you can still use collaborative family law even if you and your spouse disagree on certain issues. Collaborative law is specifically designed to help parties work through disputes in a cooperative and respectful environment. The process involves open communication, expert guidance, and a team-based approach to resolve disagreements without resorting to court.


How Collaborative Law Handles Disagreements

1. Focus on Mutual Goals

  • Both parties commit to resolving disputes amicably and focusing on shared priorities, such as the best interests of their children or maintaining financial stability.

2. Use of Neutral Experts

  • Neutral professionals, such as financial experts, child specialists, or mediators, can provide unbiased guidance to help resolve disputes.

3. Structured Negotiation

  • Collaborative law involves regular, structured meetings where each issue is addressed systematically, with both parties supported by their lawyers and the collaborative team.

4. Customized Solutions

  • The process allows for creative, tailored solutions that address the specific needs and concerns of both parties, which may not be possible in a court-imposed resolution.

5. Maintaining Control

  • Unlike litigation, where a judge imposes a decision, collaborative law gives both parties control over the outcome, encouraging compromise and reducing conflict.

Common Issues Resolved Through Collaborative Law

Parenting Arrangements

  • Disagreements about child custody, parenting time, and decision-making responsibilities can be addressed with the help of a neutral child specialist who prioritizes the children’s well-being.

Property Division

  • Disputes over the valuation and division of assets, such as businesses, real estate, or investments, can be resolved with input from financial experts.

Spousal and Child Support

  • Collaborative law allows for customized support agreements that align with both parties’ financial situations and needs.

Future Dispute Resolution

  • Agreements can include mechanisms, such as mediation or arbitration, to address future disagreements without resorting to court.

Tools for Managing Disagreements in Collaborative Law

Participation Agreement

  • Both parties sign an agreement at the outset committing to resolve disputes collaboratively and in good faith, which discourages adversarial behavior.

Coaching and Communication Tools

  • Divorce coaches or communication specialists can help improve dialogue between the parties, ensuring productive discussions even during disagreements.

Neutral Facilitators

  • In contentious situations, a mediator or neutral facilitator may be brought into the process to guide discussions and help bridge gaps.

Breakout Sessions

  • If discussions become heated, lawyers may hold private meetings with their clients to re-center focus and maintain progress.

Advantages of Collaborative Law for Disagreements

Aspect Collaborative Law Litigation
Control Over Outcome Parties work together to reach agreements. A judge imposes decisions.
Privacy Discussions remain private and confidential. Court proceedings are public.
Cost and Time Efficiency Disputes resolved efficiently with expert help. Prolonged disputes can lead to costly trials.
Relationship Preservation Encourages respectful communication. Adversarial nature can strain relationships.

 


Example in a Vancouver Context

A divorcing couple in Vancouver disagrees on how to divide a jointly owned business and a vacation home. Through collaborative law:

  • A business valuator determines the fair market value of the company, and the couple negotiates a buyout arrangement.
  • A financial expert structures a settlement that compensates one spouse with other assets instead of selling the vacation home.
  • Both parties agree on a parenting plan with input from a child specialist, ensuring minimal disruption to their children’s lives.

When Collaborative Law May Not Work

Lack of Good Faith

  • If one party is unwilling to negotiate honestly or disclose assets, the process may fail.

Extreme Power Imbalances

  • Significant financial or emotional control by one party may make collaborative negotiations unfair.

History of Abuse or Violence

  • Collaborative law is not suitable when safety or coercion is a concern.

Seek Legal Assistance

If you and your spouse disagree on certain issues but want to avoid the stress and expense of court, collaborative family law can help. Mills Family Law, experienced Vancouver family lawyers, can guide you through how this process can work for your unique situation. Call us at 778-945-3003 or fill out our web form to get started today.


Related FAQs

For more details, consult the Family Law Act of BC or speak with a collaborative lawyer to explore your options.